For Immediate Release: February 13, 2002
Media Contact: Claudia Chandler (916) 654-4989
N E W S R E L E A S E
Energy Commission Releases Final Staff
Assessment of
Potrero Power Plant Unit 7
Sacramento - The California Energy Commission staff recommends licensing
of the Potrero Power Plant Project only with mitigation that includes
two key measures. Those measures would reduce local air pollution and
eliminate the use of San Francisco Bay water to cool the proposed
facility.
The measures recommended by the Energy Commission staff to reduce the
project's impacts on public health and the environment include the
following:
- Local mitigation to cut local air pollution and its resulting
public health impacts. The staff's recommendation would require the
applicant to spend $1 million to retrofit diesel vehicles in San
Francisco, primarily school busses, Muni busses and garbage trucks, or
provide an ultra-low-sulfur diesel or natural gas refueling station to
reduce air pollution.
- The staff also recommends a hybrid or dry cooling system for the
plant in place of the once-through system that is part of the
applicant's proposal. The hybrid system would utilize reclaimed water
from the nearby wastewater treatment plant, thus avoiding the impacts a
once-through cooling system would have on aquatic species in San
Francisco Bay.
The recommendations are among the conclusions of the Energy Commission
Final Staff Assessment released today. The document is available on the
Energy Commission website at:
www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/potrero/documents/
The Final Staff Assessment is not a decision or proposed decision on the
Potrero Project. It is the Energy Commission staff's analysis of the
project. That analysis will become part of the evidentiary record, upon
which the Potrero Project Siting Committee will base its proposed
decision later in the process. Included in the Final Staff Assessment
is a Local System Effects study the Energy Commission conducted in
conjunction with the California Independent System Operator that
evaluates the need for electricity from Potrero Unit 7. The proposed
plant would improve the reliability of San Francisco's electrical grid
and provide a significant source of power to support the system that now
relies on old, unreliable and inefficient generation along with
near-capacity transmission lines. Potrero Unit 7 would reduce the threat
of blackouts in San Francisco and save electric ratepayers about $55 to
$80 million from reduced transmission losses over the next 20 years.
Anyone with comments on the Local System Effects Study can submit them
to the Energy Commission through February 27, 2002. Comments should be
sent to:
The California Energy Commission
Docket Unit, MS-4 Attn:
Docket No. 00-AFC-4
1516 Ninth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814-5512
Mirant Potrero LLC, a direct subsidiary of Mirant, is proposing to build
and operate the Potrero Power Plant Unit 7 alongside the existing
360-megawatt Potrero Power Plant. The new combined-cycle facility would
consist of two combustion turbines with heat recovery steam generators
and a steam turbine that would produce a total of 540 megawatts.
Pollution controls would include Selective Catalytic Reduction systems
to reduce emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and CO catalysts to
control carbon monoxide emissions. The project also includes an
underground transmission line to the Hunters Point substation.
The next step in the review process will be a pre-hearing conference to
be scheduled in mid-March.
Public participation is an important part of the Energy Commission
licensing process. For information on how to get involved in the project
review, contact the Commission's Public Adviser, Roberta Mendonca, at
(916) 654-4489, (800) 822-6228, or by e-mail at
pao@energy.state.ca.us.
# # #