From: Denz-Hamilton, Jona Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:53 AM To: Denz-Hamilton, Jona Subject: Dear Mayor Gonzales, Re: Proposed San Jose Power Plant (Metcalf) Thank your for responding to the concerns of the overwhelming majority of the people you represent by opposing the poorly conceived power plant project proposed for our city. Calpine's proposed San Jose power plant project: 1.Would threaten the economy of Silicon Valley and of the State by downgrading San Jose's Coyote Valley area, long reserved for premier campus uses, to heavy industrial; 2.Would release over 1,000 TONS of emissions annually into the airshed of over 1 million people; 3.Would place the #1 worst polluting business in the City of San Jose within ½ mile of existing neighborhoods, homes, schools, and offices; 4.Would place one of the worst polluters in the entire Bay area in the City with the most people and the most children per household, and in an area that already has the WORST air quality in the Bay area; 5.Is opposed by Mayor Gonzales, local councilmembers, City of Morgan Hill, neighborhood groups, environmental groups, and many others who have spent thousands of hours researching this complex issue; 6.Is opposed by Cisco Systems, the #1 corporation in the State of California and the largest employer in the City of San Jose. Losing California's #1 Corporation to North Carolina or Texas, losing the 20,000 jobs Cisco Systems plans to add to the local economy, so we can favor a heavily polluting project that will threaten people's health in one of California's largest population centers, use our air as a sewer to swill away its waste, and provide only 24 full time jobs, would threaten the economy of San Jose, Silicon Valley, and the State of California. The "shortage" of power that led to the June 14 Bay area blackout was 130 megawatts (MW). Six new power plant projects have already been approved since deregulation; four of them are actually under construction. Together they represent almost 5,000 megawatts (MW) of power generation capacity, or 40 times more than the June 14 shortage. Additionally, projects totaling nearly 10,000 MW are in the California Energy Commission (CEC) approval pipeline. By 2003, when construction is complete on these projects, we will be generating power in excess of state needs by 15%, and will be exporting power. In fact, there are more projects before the CEC this year than there have been in the last 15 years combined. Most of these projects will likely be approved, as the great majority have NO LOCAL OPPOSITION. For example, 3/4 of projects currently under review by CEC have no local opposition. Most are in appropriate heavy industrial areas. Many good power plant projects are already in the process of being approved. The state and Bay area will be wellserved when projects under construction come online in 2002. The proposed San Jose power plant could not be built soon enough to avert current shortages. There is only one beneficiary of the proposed Metcalf Energy Center: Calpine. Bad projects are never justified. I support you in your fine representation of the people of San Jose and surrounding areas in opposing Calpine's power plant project proposed for San Jose. Sincerely, Mrs. Joan Denz-Hamilton (address removed at her request) cc: Vice Mayor Fiscalini Councilmember Lezotte Councilmember Powers Councilmember Chavez Councilmember Diaz Councilmember Shirakawa Councilmember Woody Councilmember Diquisto Councilmember Dando Mr. Paul Richins, CEC Ms. Roberta Mendonca, CEC CEC Docket 99-AFC-3 Commissioner Keese Commissioner Laurie Commissioner Moore Commissioner Pernell Commissioner Rosenfeld Governor Gray Davis Santa Teresa Citizen Action Group Commissioner Hoo Commissioner Dhillon Commissioner Godbolt Commissioner James Commissioner Levy Commissioner Ross Commissioner Zamora Candidate Napoli Candidate Williams Candidate Chu Candidate Reed Candidate Cunningham Candidate Yeager Candidate Cortese Candidate Garcia San Jose Mercury News DOCKET 99-AFC-3 Date: Sep. 28, 00 Recd: Sep. 28, 00