[California Energy Commission Letterhead]


STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Energy Resources
Conservation and Development Commission



In the Matter of: ) Docket No. 99-SIT-1
)  
Pastoria Power Project, LLC ) NOTICE OF COMMISSION HEARING
Petition for Jurisdictional Determination ) --and-- COMMITTEE ORDER
_____________________________________ ) (Cal. Code of Regs., title 20, section 1232(2))


I. BACKGROUND

On January 25, 1999, Pastoria Power Project, LLC (Petitioner) filed a "Petition for Jurisdictional Determination" requesting the Commission to determine whether its proposed project is exempt from the Notice of Intention (NOI) requirements of Public Resources Code section 25502. Petitioner asserts that its proposed natural gas-fired power plant project meets the requirements of Public Resources Code section 25540.6. {Public Resources Code section 25540.6 provides, in pertinent part, that no NOI is required for a power plant which "...is the result of a competitive solicitation or negotiation for new generation resources and will employ natural gas-fired technology...."} The project is a market-based response to the restructuring of California's electricity industry and the formation of the California Power Exchange (PX), and will be operated to sell all or some of its electricity output through the PX and into wholesale and/or retail power markets.

II. NOTICE OF COMMISSION HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Commission will conduct a public hearing on this Petition at its regularly scheduled Business Meeting as follows:

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 17, 1999
Beginning at 10 a.m.
California Energy Commission
First Floor Hearing Room A
1516 Ninth Street
Sacramento, California
[Wheelchair Accessible]



III. COMMITTEE ORDER

Petitioner is developing the proposed natural gas-fired Pastoria Power Project to participate in the competitive electricity market. In light of the Commission's precedential Decision in Blythe Energy, which addresses issues similar to the assertions contained in this Petition, the Energy Facility Siting Committee may review a Petition for an NOI exemption on the basis of sworn testimony, as well as other documentary evidence, and present its recommendations to the full Commission without the necessity of conducting a Committee hearing.

The Committee hereby directs Petitioner to respond to the following inquiries regarding its Petition:

  1. Describe the specific nexus between the particular project proposed by Petitioner and the PX's solicitations for "day ahead" and "hourly bids". How is the proposed project anticipated to perform under both scenarios regarding its baseload and peaking capacities?

  2. Is Petitioner negotiating with any other potential power exchanges or power purchasers, including wholesale and/or retail markets?

  3. What is Petitioner's registration status at the PX? If Petitioner has not begun the registration process, what are Petitioner's plans regarding registration and negotiation for a "PX Participation Agreement?"

  4. Identify Petitioner's principal corporate owners and/or other entities or individuals who are legally and financially responsible for the development, construction, and operation of the proposed project.

  5. Describe Petitioner's experience and assets with regard to power generation acquisition, and power plant development, ownership, and operation; and, if the project proponents do not have such experience, identify the entity or entities that will be responsible for development, construction, and operation of the power plant facility.

  6. Describe the specific site location where the project will be constructed, and describe Petitioner's site selection criteria that led to this particular site location; also, include the locations of any other existing or proposed power plant projects that are or will be connected to the Midway Sunset Control Center in the Southern California Edison (SCE) power grid by the summer of 2002.

  7. Provide evidence describing the project components sufficiently to establish that the proposed facility is a natural gas-fired power plant.

  8. Provide evidence to establish that the proposed project can be developed and operated without the benefit of ratepayer support or guarantees.

  9. Explain how Petitioner's negotiations may be affected by the Independent System Operator's "congestion" and "ancillary services" market activities.


Petitioner shall serve its written responses to the above inquiries in the form of testimony executed under penalty of perjury by one or more principals representing the project, as well as any other evidence, and Commission staff shall serve a written statement discussing the matters raised in the Petition, upon all entities included on the Proof of Service List as well as those listed in Attachment A, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 17, 1999. Identify all filings with "Docket No. 99-SIT-1." The Committee also advises any individual or entity intending to actively participate in this proceeding to file and serve a written statement explaining its position, in accordance with the above filing directions.

Based on the sworn testimony and other evidence submitted, the Committee will prepare a recommendation concerning disposition of the Petition for consideration by the full Commission at the March 17, 1999, hearing. The parties will have an opportunity to review and comment upon the Committee's recommendation prior to the hearing.

For information on how to participate at the hearing, contact Roberta Mendonca, the Commission's Public Adviser, at (916) 654-4489 or 800-822-6228 or e-mail at: pao@energy.state.ca.us

If you have a disability and require reasonable accommodation to participate, contact Robert Sifuentes at (916) 654-5004 or email at: rsifuent@energy.state.ca.us

Procedural or legal questions may be directed to the Hearing Officer, Susan Gefter, at (916) 654-3893 or e-mail at: sgefter@energy.state.ca.us



Placed On Line: February 4, 1999 ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION



____________________________________ ____________________________________
ROBERT A. LAURIE DAVID A ROHY, Ph.D.
Commissioner and Presiding Member Vice Chair and Associate Member
Energy Facility Siting Committee Energy Facility Siting Committee





| Back to Main Page | Homepage | Calendar | Directory/Index | Search |